Take it away, Ed. ...Perhaps he should get his own blog...oh wait.
Dear Ward 4 Neighbor:
The City Council's Public Safety Committee will meet on Thursday, May 7 at 4:30PM at City Hall to discuss an Order re Anna Jaques Hospital (AJH) directional signage. I wanted you to know about the meeting and also ask for any feedback from you in terms of the signage locations.
There are a variety of reasons to access the Hospital: patients needing to go to an appointment, patients rushing for an emergency situation, staff going to work, ambulances in a hurry, and delivery vehicles.
Since the Access Road opened, the Hospital has worked with its vendors on delivery routes. While an emergency obviously requires the quickest route, the Hospital has worked with Ambulance services to minimize local impact.
In February, I sponsored two Orders to increase usage of the Access Road off Low Street, designed to reduce reliance on the narrow residential streets such as Hunter Drive, Rawson Avenue, Lafayette Street, Arlington Street, and Highland Avenue.
The Council passed the first Order which removed signage on Low St/Hunter Drive and put a sign across from the Access Road on Low Street.
At the same time a more complicated Order on overall Hospital signage across the City was referred to the Council's Public Safety Committee. This is the Committee which deals with traffic issues. I've attached the language of that Order.
The attached Order removes and adds signs to direct routine patient and staff traffic to Low Street and the Access Road. In other words, if you're coming to AJH from Route 95, you'll be directed down Low Street at Storey Ave. If you're coming to AJH from the Chain Bridge, you'll be directed around to Low Street via Storey Ave. If you're coming to AJH from Rt. 1, you'll be directed to Low Street.
That said, I'm also in favor of retaining the signage on High Street at the base of Rawson Ave. If you're coming to AJH from High Street (ie North End) area, I think it makes sense for people to go up Rawson, especially in the event of a more immediate need, rather than route them all the way around to Low Street. The bottom line is that Rawson will still have much less traffic than it has in the past.
In Committee at the meeting this Thursday, there will be an opportunity to make any changes/removals/additions to this overall list. The most likely scenario is that this will be worked on in Committee, then brought back to the full Council.
Again please let me know if you have any feedback or any questions.
Thank you,
Ed CameronWard 4 City Councillor
I have ABSOLUTELY no opinion on this. None. I'm just being a good blogging citizen.
I do like the new access road.
6 comments:
Hi Tom,
I put that email out to anyone in Ward 4 whose email I have.
And it's on my blog.
Ed
Gotcha Ed. I was just joking around while demonstrating the passive agressive/martyr complex that makes us Salemis so fun to be related to.
Consider yourself family.
I think you spelt (sic) 'aggressive' wrongly.
Grammarily yours,
Ed
Thanks Man.
Mr. Cameron should do a better job of communicating with his Ward 4 constituents - he "put an email out to anyone in Ward 4 whose email" he happens to have? You must be joking! I've lived in Ward 4 for over 10 years, and I have yet to (a) meet (b) talk to or (c) exchange emails with Councilor Cameron. The only reason I even know what he looks like is from watching cable council mtgs. He should've learned from Obama's campaign: grassroots. Walk the ward, have ward mtgs., connect with people. What has he done for Ward 4? Election season is coming.
Just curious anon, what hasn't he done? You have some concerns that have gone unaddressed? Now's the time to share.
Post a Comment